Tuesday, December 28, 2021

Forecasting the Omicron winter: Experts envision various scenarios

(A fairly long, but pithy explanation of what we can look forward to for the future)
December 27, 2021
From STAT

Since the Omicron variant was discovered four weeks ago, epidemiologists have been crunching data as fast as scientists on the front lines can produce it to scope out what the newest coronavirus variant means for the pandemic this winter beyond. While many uncertainties remain, disease modelers have cranked out several potential visions for what the first months of 2022 may have in store. Worst case — they could bring the deadliest phase of the pandemic yet. But even the most optimistic scenarios aren’t exactly pretty.

Which immediate future plays out will be a function of a few big unknowns — some already baked into Omicron’s biology and some that can be altered based on how people behave in the coming days and weeks. Further out, the models get fuzzier still. But though they differ in the details, all of them point to SARS-CoV-2 being here to stay.

“I think we may be in for a longer road than we had hoped,” said Jeffrey Shaman, an infectious disease forecaster at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health.

What’s obvious about Omicron is its record-setting spread. Harder to grasp is the extent to which it is intrinsically more contagious than previous variants, versus the extent to which it’s simply better at infecting vaccinated and previously infected individuals.

In a preprint published this week, Shaman and his colleague Wan Yang tried to disentangle these two dynamics using data from South Africa, where the variant was first discovered. They found Omicron to be only about 35% more transmissible than Delta, a departure from the going estimate of twice to five times as infectious. The takeaway? The researchers believe that the majority of South Africans had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 before the Omicron wave, meaning the rapid spread was due more to the variant’s ability to erode the immunity conferred by previous infections or vaccines.

“That’s not something that should apply directly to other countries, like the U.S., because it’s very specific to the South African context,” said Shaman. Different strains took off there, leading to an immunological history not as relevant to the Northern Hemisphere. “How much immune erosion we can expect here will be hard to say,” said Shaman. “However, we’re talking about large numbers, so we could imagine it’s going to be pretty potent at running by the immunity of people who’ve already been infected or vaccinated in most places it shows up.”

That could be a recipe for the Omicron surge being the most devastating one yet. In one of the most comprehensive forecasts to date, researchers from the Covid-19 Modeling Consortium at the University of Texas, Austin, played out 18 different scenarios for how the new variant might hit the U.S.

In the report, which has not been peer-reviewed, the worst outcome arose when the researchers assumed Omicron to be no more transmissible than Delta but far better at evading immunity and more likely to cause severe disease — meaning requiring hospitalization. Combined with low booster uptake, this scenario resulted in cases peaking in early February, resulting in 342,000 deaths over the first six months of the year, a 20% spike over Covid-19 casualties in 2021.

In the most optimistic outcome — which assumes high transmissibility relative to Delta, little ability to evade immunity, slightly elevated severity, and high booster uptake — the researchers project the Omicron spike to lead to 50% fewer deaths compared to last year.

“Across all scenarios we expect to see cases that are at least as high as the Delta surge in September 2021, but that would be the minimum,” said Lauren Ancel Meyers, director of the UT Covid-19 Modeling Consortium. “At a maximum we could see a surge in cases that is even higher than our January 2021 surge, which would make it the biggest national surge seen to date.”

Whether these surges lead to equally calamitous casualties hinges hugely on that question of severity, an issue that has remained murky for weeks. On Wednesday, however, three separate teams of researchers, tracking Omicron’s advance through South Africa, Scotland, and England, reported new findings that suggesting the variant was less likely than Delta to send people to hospitals. Though preliminary, these studies are providing an injection of optimism that the worst-case scenarios won’t come to pass.
Looking overseas for clues

In South Africa, where the Omicron infection wave went steeply up and then sharply back down, particularly in Gauteng province, the peak of hospitalizations looks to be about half of the previous Delta wave. Deaths and ICU admissions appear even lower.

“That initial coming in really hot … is really scary, but what we saw in Gauteng, of its kind of crashing early, gives some hope here,” said computational biologist Trevor Bedford of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, who was among the first U.S. experts to sound the initial alarm on SARS-CoV-2.

It’s a tricky thing though, to extrapolate the shape of that curve from South African provinces like Gauteng because the populations there look very different from either Europe or the U.S. People there tend to be younger, and therefore less prone to serious disease than in the U.S., where the population skews older and sicker, with more comorbidities like heart disease and diabetes. Another difference is that in South Africa, Omicron was a standalone surge. In contrast, here Omicron is hitting on top of Delta surges in the Northeast and Midwest, compounding the strain on health care systems.

Bedford is keeping an eye on London, where infections have exploded in recent days. Even by conservative estimates of detection rates, 1% of London is getting infected every day. That’s a big number. And even if the risk of hospitalization may be substantially lower per individual — a new analysis suggests that might be the case — that many infections would be markedly disruptive to society and to the functioning of health care systems. “So it really matters when that crests,” said Bedford. “If it crashes as early as it did in Gauteng, then it’s not so bad. But if it gets past that, then things get bad pretty quickly.”

Since Friday, Meyers’ team has updated its forecasts based on the increasing evidence that Omicron is becoming dominant in the U.S. even faster than expected. The researchers will continue to do so as more and better data on the severity question come in. But given how rapidly Omicron is advancing, the peak might arrive before firm answers do. Especially if a “less severe” narrative begins to take hold and people’s behaviors don’t change.

“Even in our most optimistic scenarios, the numbers are already surging to such high levels that we’re worried about what’s to come in the next couple of weeks in our hospitals,” said Meyers.

The models might be noisy; assumptions and uncertainties abound when data is sparse, which happens when a new variant emerges. But they’re better than nothing. And right now, they’re telling us we’ve entered a high-risk period, said Meyers. “So if ever there was a time to err on the side of caution, it’s now,” she said. “If we all tap the brakes a little bit right now, that can help us to protect the integrity of our health care system and also prevent us from really having to slam on the brakes at some point in the future.”
‘A viral blizzard.’

On Tuesday, President Biden announced steps the White House is taking to curb Covid-19 as Omicron overtakes Delta, which was already causing 115,000 daily new infections at the beginning of December. Those steps included delivering 500 million at-home rapid tests to households, starting in January, and urging Americans to get vaccinated and boosted. “Your choice can be the difference between life and death,” Biden said.
The administration also announced it would deploy some 1,000 military doctors, nurses, and medics to support hospitals, as well as activate pop-up vaccination and testing units run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Some public health experts say it’s not enough to deal with the coming body blow to the American health care system.

“All of the surges we’ve had to date have been regional and time-limited in a way that meant you could allocate resources from one place to another as needed,” said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. When the first wave of 2020 slammed New York City, other states sent ventilators and personal protective equipment. Later that summer, supplies were shuttled to Florida and other southern states feeling their first surge. And on through 2021 as northern states felt the worst of the winter wave, and the south got smacked with Delta this past summer. But SARS-CoV-2 has never walloped everywhere all at once.

“We’re going to be in a viral blizzard nationwide these next two to eight weeks, and the impact of this perfect storm is going to be felt hardest by our health care systems,” said Osterholm. “It could very well represent the darkest days of the pandemic.”

The U.S. currently employs about 9.8 million doctors, nurses, and high-level medical technicians. Omicron’s ability to erode protections from vaccination and prior infections means that at least 10% of those health care workers are likely to become infected and have to isolate, even if their symptoms are mild. “That’s 900,000 people off the job at a time when we’re already hanging on by the skin of our teeth as it is,” said Osterholm. “The president’s plan does not really address that problem.”
A worldwide wave

It’s not just the U.S. being hit in every state simultaneously. For the first time since the start of the pandemic, modelers are expecting a rapid surge all over the world.

On Wednesday, the University of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation released new projections, showing approximately 3 billion infections globally between now and the end of February. “We believe it will reach all countries quite soon,” the institute’s director, Chris Murray, told reporters at a briefing.

If the numbers are to be believed — critics have previously assailed the institute’s Covid-19 modeling as unreliable — then we’re talking about two years’ worth of infections cresting in the next two months. Murray’s team is projecting comparatively modest deaths during that staggering surge, fewer than the number caused by Delta, owing to a vast number of the infections being mild or asymptomatic. But stealth spread coupled with Omicron’s rapid replication rate causes other sorts of problems; traditional public health strategies like testing, contact tracing, isolation, and quarantine start to fall apart.

“There’s just not enough time to detect infections and act on that information,” said William Moss, executive director of the International Vaccine Access Center at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. That means even countries who’ve had very few cases, like New Zealand and many small Pacific Islands, may have a hard time holding off Omicron.

China, where most citizens have received either the Sinopharm or Sinovac shots, is particularly vulnerable to major disease and disruption. Both vaccines have shown particular weakness against Omicron in preliminary lab studies. Strict lockdowns in areas where many countries still outsource production of many pharmaceuticals and medical supplies could lead to new and more severe rounds of shortages.

“As countries experience surges, there’s going to be demand within those countries for a whole range of products and treatments, which limits the ability to get those to other countries that lack the manufacturing capacity themselves,” said Moss. “This pandemic, over and over, has exacerbated these inequalities, and a huge global surge will place the low-income and most vulnerable countries at a disadvantage yet again.”

He also worries about the long-term knock-on effects of massive disruptions to already fragile health care systems. Huge waves will likely mean pausing other medical services, like malaria and tuberculosis prevention, care for chronic disease patients, and routine childhood immunization. “I’m very afraid of huge measles outbreaks in the next year or two, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa,” said Moss. “We could be seeing ripple effects of Omicron for years.”
The long view

The newest variant has also inexorably altered the course of the pandemic. Although it’s still unclear how high and how fast the curves will climb (and how many people will get very sick or die in the process), Murray said when he and his team run their models further out, they see Covid-19 quieting down for much of 2022. “The thing Omicron will do because it’s going to infect 40% of the entire world in the next two months, is it will raise population-wide immunity for a while,” he said. After a massive Omicron wave passes through, transmission should drop to very low levels. Ongoing rollouts of vaccines should help keep it that way.

But forecasting is hard and gets harder the further out you go. And the one big caveat to every far-out-future scenario is how the coronavirus will evolve next. “The long-term prospects for 2022 and beyond are very much a function of what the next variant that comes along shows,” said Murray.

Next year should see the scaling-up of antiviral production, he also pointed out. As future variants drive new waves in infections, the wide availability of these treatments — especially Pfizer’s newly authorized pill, which the company expects to make 120 million courses of in 2022, should blunt hospitalizations and deaths further.

“We would be in a different place, at least temporarily, at the end of the current surge than we’ve been at any point since the beginning of the pandemic,” said UT’s Meyers.

The result could be something that starts to look like SARS-CoV-2 becoming an endemic coronavirus and joining a quartet of more ancient, cold-causing cousins. As Bedford has suggested, we might look back on the Omicron surge as the last wave of the pandemic. If, after all the dust settles, Omicron does turn out to cause milder disease, then its world domination could turn out to be a good thing in the very grand scheme of things.

But between variant evolution and waning immunity, that’s not to say the virus won’t still lead to significant casualties in that endemic future. “I could still easily imagine 100,000 people [in the United States] dying every year from Covid in the endemic state just because you have a very big number of infections, even if the infection fatality rate is quite low,” Bedford told STAT. In 2020, 385,000 Americans died from Covid-19, according to data collected by the CDC. By November of this year, deaths associated with Covid-19 in 2021 had already surpassed that.

But guessing where exactly the next variant will arise and what problematic properties it will have is pretty much impossible, even for the sharpest Covid minds. Back in September, Bedford predicted that whatever came next would almost certainly be a twist of the then-dominant variant, Delta. But then Omicron materialized almost out of nowhere — its closest evolutionary relatives versions of the virus not seen since summer of 2020, leading some scientists to hypothesize that it might have come from an animal host.

If it could happen with Omicron, it could certainly happen again. SARS-CoV-2 is what’s known as a promiscuous virus. It gets around, and not just in humans. Scientists have found it in dogs and house cats. Tigers and lions. Gorillas. Mink. And it’s really taken off in whitetail deer.

Last month, researchers reported that up to 40% of deer populations in Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New York had antibodies to the coronavirus. Another group found active SARS-CoV-2 infections in at least 30% of deer tested across Iowa in 2020. The findings suggest that the animals could become a long-term reservoir: a safe haven where the virus can circulate and evolve indefinitely, spilling back mutated versions of it to humans from time to time. While the virus doesn’t have an infinite capacity to mutate — it still needs to be able to bind to human receptors to get into our cells — this promiscuity will certainly complicate efforts to manage SARS-CoV-2 in the coming years and decades. And yes, you heard that right: decades.

“Whether or not it becomes endemic in six months or a year or five years from now, this virus is sticking around on Planet Earth, probably forever,” said Jeremy Kamil, a virologist at Louisiana State University Health Shreveport. “As long as humans and animals and rodents are around, it will continue to evolve and change and probably won’t be the threat it is today, but it’s not going away.”

Even if we accept that permanence, we still hunger to see around the corner. At the beginning of the pandemic, Osterholm and his colleagues attempted to predict its future course, using historical influenza pandemics as a guide. As STAT’s Sharon Begley wrote at the time, they envisioned three possible futures: a monster-wave followed by mini-waves every few months with placid times between, recurring small outbreaks, and constant crisis. What we’ve had in reality is something that doesn’t look exactly like any of these.

In the United States, SARS-CoV-2 was never really brought under control, so the successive viral surges of spring, then summer, then winter of 2020 weren’t really waved so much as humps in an ever-building coronavirus current. Vaccines brought a precipitous drop in the first few months of 2021, but then Delta emerged, and then Omicron, and now 2021 is looking like 2020 again, but bigger, with even more infectious energy behind it.

“At the time, we had no way to understand the power of these variants,” said Osterholm. “What has made this such a challenging pathogen to predict is that its mutational changes are really different than what we see with the flu virus. We thought it would behave somewhat like influenza, but it’s turned out to be a very different animal.”

Helen Branswell contributed reporting.

Correction: An earlier version of this story misstated Trevor Bedford’s view on when SARS-CoV-2 will enter the endemic phase. He says it will reach that point next year, after the Omicron wave.

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

Retiring not expiring...

Some of you may have already heard the rumors, but I’m making it official today. Yes, I’m retiring, but that doesn’t mean the Firefighter Challenge is too. In fact, the future has never been brighter for the program.

After much thought, I felt the Challenge in the United States would best continue and hopefully expand if placed under the umbrella of a nonprofit that aligns with its purpose. The First Responder Institute, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, will become home to the Challenge effective in the early part of 2022. You’re probably unfamiliar with this group as they’ve worked quietly behind the scenes for many years focused on various research endeavors. However, I’m familiar with them as one of the founding members. Their mission perfectly aligns with that of the Challenge: to inspire First Responders to aim for the highest level of fitness, wellness, and safety.

Reflecting on my incredible journey, I vividly remember in 1974 when Chief David Gratz, Director of Fire/Rescue Services, Montgomery County, MD, walked into the Human Performance Laboratory at the Sports Medicine Center of the University of Maryland. He, accompanied with Dr. Leonard Marks, expressed the need for a validated test to use for new recruits. The mission: develop a physical ability test to determine whether a job applicant had the requisite capabilities to perform the essential job functions. As part of the study in 1976, my colleagues and I developed a physical testing course as a living laboratory. After witnessing the favorable response and proven results of the course, I launched the Firefighter Challenge in 1991.

Fast forward 30+ years, this endeavor has exceeded well beyond my original vision. It has allowed me the privilege of interacting with thousands of firefighters from around the world. Many are not just competitors in the Challenge but are ambassadors of the importance of proper and ongoing training in the fire service.

I am indebted to our competitors and sponsors for making the Firefighter Challenge a global sensation and look forward to the exciting future ahead for the US operations. Soon you’ll be introduced to Russell Jackson, the CEO of the nonprofit that myself and members of the board recruited to carry the program to the next level. His background in the nonprofit sector is extensive, and we are honored that he accepted our invitation to help. In the coming weeks, a few Zoom sessions will be held so you can meet him but more importantly, hear about some of the enhancements coming to the Challenge in 2022 and beyond.

Until then, as I’ve jokingly been saying, “I’m retiring, not expiring!” Now my time will be free to focus on my original intent in developing research endeavors and professional development programs specific to the fire service. Furthermore, as the owner of the authored work, trademarks, etc., I will continue to support the Firefighter Challenge programs in other countries as part of OnTarget Challenge.

I’m confident that our paths will continue to cross. The First Responder Institute will further the positive impact the Challenge has already made in the fire sector. Thank you for your friendship and support!

Watch this space for more exciting adventures. 

Thursday, December 9, 2021

HEY! Let's Be Careful Out There

Not telling you anything that you don't already know, but the typical motorist on a freeway is NOT paying much attention to the road ahead. 

The idea of putting an old piece of apparatus as a part of the initial assignment for any limited access highway is a brilliant idea.

Check out this raw footage of a LA freeway pileup. 

Monday, December 6, 2021

Another one in the "Win" column

Here's a short story about an EMS call in Anne Arundel County posted on the community bulletin board:

Thank you to AA County Fire and Rescue. My husband fell off the roof today while trying to clean the gutters. 911 responded and after he was safely loaded into the ambulance, the fire crew cleaned my gutters, took the blower on the roof and finished the job, took down the ladder, loaded it into the shed and locked it up for me. That is world-class service and I have never been so touched by a simple act of kindness.

I've seen other wonderful stories of firefighters performing tasks beyond the minimus. Chief Brunacini always put things in the perspective of customer service, where Mrs. Smith was not exactly having a good day. How can you help? And help in a meaningful way that goes a step beyond.

There's never anything quite like an act of kindness; just reaching for an item on the top shelf in the grocery store for a little old short lady can make the day for both of you; it did for me.

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Selfishness is America’s Deadliest Virus - John Pavlovitz, Aug 2021





I can’t believe we’re still here.

I can’t believe that we’re entering the second full year of this unfathomable madness.

We are, and we don’t need to be.

Here in America, we have enough vaccines for every adult here; the embarrassment of riches most nations on this planet are literally begging for—and nearly half of our people are simply refusing them.

Despite how many have already died.
Despite the fear and lack and grieving of the past eighteen months.
Despite all the time we’ve missed with people we love.
Despite every desperate plea from educated people who have spent their lives so that we could be prepared for a moment like this.
Despite how relentlessly they demanded that we open America.

They are saying no, to the help that we have all been waiting two years for. They are saying no to compassion for other people.

It doesn’t matter to them that the variants are replicating with starling speed and velocity.
It doesn’t matter that the ICUs are overflowing again, that cancer patients are having to postpone surgeries due to hospital shortages, that children are increasingly getting sick and dying.
Nothing moves the needle of their hearts enough to perform the simplest act on behalf of millions of people they share this nation with and can help keep safe and alive.

Selfishness is America’s second deadly virus and it may be one we cannot overcome. It will be here far longer than COVID or its variants, because it was here before them.

I wish there was a vaccine that could make these people give a damn about other human beings; that we could inoculate them against whatever toxic cocktail of ignorance, fear, arrogance, political tribalism, and bad religion that has rendered them resistant to the suffering of others.

I suppose this shouldn’t have been a surprise. I imagine their denials of the virus and their refusal to mask and their defiance of safeguards should have tipped me off, but still I did not expect this entrenched and strident refusal to help other people, especially the many who claim to follow a “love your neighbor” Jesus.

I guess I expected too much from America.

When this nightmare began, I truly imagined that this would eventually be our finest hour: that we would be fully invested in one another in ways we hadn’t been in decades, that we would all recognize our interdependence, that we would set aside every political affiliation and religious agenda and do the kinds of sacrificial acts America had been known for in times of war.

When the vaccines were launched I felt a cathartic wave of relief, believing that we would soon be living lives that somewhat resembled what they looked like two years ago; that by now some semblance of normalcy would have returned. Instead, we are facing another flood of outbreaks, another school year decimated by sicknesses and stoppages, another season of postponed visits and interrupted plans, another winter of unimaginable death.

And the stomach-turning thing about it all, is that it isn’t being driven by some invisible, insidious virus that floats through the air, but passed person to person by our family members and neighbors and coworkers: by the people we share this nation with, those we rely on to do the right thing, those our health and livelihoods and futures are tethered to. We cannot escape them or defeat them and so we are victims of them: the penalty for their recklessness we will pay too; the human collateral damage of their destructive choices will be ours, as well.

That is going to be the story here of these years: not of the faceless public health threat that attacked this nation and the world—but of the cruelty and selfishness of those we know and love and live with, who gave it every opportunity to ravage us, who were willing accomplices to the death and the suffering, who said no to compassion when it called.

Until love and mercy and kindness take hold in the hearts of these people, until they are burdened with the common good, that lack of empathy will be a sickness that will destroy us.

Thursday, November 18, 2021

A firefighter’s experience with bariatric weight loss surgery

From Fire-Rescue 1 Nov 18, 2021

“Rates of overweight and obese individuals in the fire service are higher than those found in the general public, ranging from 73 percent to 88 percent of firefighters.”

This disturbing finding comes to us from the National Volunteer Fire Council.

Other major fire service organizations have come to similar conclusions, with further research showing the outcomes of our poor health. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) reports that in 2019, over 50% of all line-of-duty deaths (LODDs) were the result of sudden cardiac arrest.


"Throughout my fire service career, I constantly felt that I had to work harder and do more simply to break even with the 'in-shape' firefighters," writes Philip Clark. (Photo/Philip Clark)

We’ve been hearing these stats for years – but that doesn’t always mean we take action to avoid becoming a statistic ourselves.
“I was falling behind”

I cannot remember a time in my adult life, or most of my childhood for that matter, that I was not overweight. It was a constant struggle. I ate from boredom, I ate from depression, I ate just to eat. I did not have healthy habits.

Slowly I went from husky to chubby to big to fat to morbidly obese. Much like a frog in a pot of heated water, the change was so gradual that I didn’t notice it was killing me. I didn’t wake up one morning overweight; it was a series of bad choices and poor self-care that led me to my own downfall.

Throughout my fire service career, I constantly felt that I had to work harder and do more simply to break even with the “in-shape” firefighters. But if I was being honest with myself, I wasn’t breaking even. I was falling behind. My crew would have to work harder to complete the task because I wasn’t keeping up. I remember a time when working at a structure fire would be the only event of my day because I was physically spent after the call. I realized that I was putting not only myself but also my family and my fellow firefighters at risk.

The sobering statistics above, along with several personal realizations, led me to make a life-altering decision. I needed to make a change. I needed to start taking my health seriously.
“Preparing for the rest of my life”

In June 2020, I started the process of meeting with a bariatric center for weight loss surgery. The process, as I would learn, was more involved than I had realized. I would spend the next three months preparing for the rest of my life. I met with a dietician to discuss my eating habits, and together, we created a plan for success. I met with the surgeon who laid out all the requirements for my surgery to take place. I started a diet almost immediately following my first appointment, and over the next few months, I had regular checkups with my team to ensure that I was sticking to the plan.

At two weeks out from the surgery, I was put on a full liquid diet that consisted of creamed soup, yogurt, pudding, Jell-O and protein shakes. At the time, I was working a full-time night shift in a busy 911 system. Meal prep was a must because, as you can imagine, there aren’t many options for a liquid diet from a gas station at 3 a.m.

Finally, in October, the day came that changed my life. I joined the “Loser’s Bench.”

The surgery was simple enough, at least according to the doctors. Through five small incisions in my abdomen, they would remove around 80% of my stomach, essentially turning my stomach from a ball shape to a banana shape. The surgery not only creates a smaller “pouch” for food to fit in to but also suppresses appetite. The doctors projected that I would lose 75-80% of my excess weight simply from the surgery. The rest would be up to me and the lifestyle changes I enacted.
“The weight began to come off”

Recovery went well. My first two weeks after surgery required a clear liquid diet. This is like the full liquid diet, but it removes any liquid you cannot see through. If you’re thinking that this sounds unenjoyable, you’re right! I lived off of Jell-O and beef or chicken broth.


"I had cinched up my turnout gear as much as I could, but after losing 50 lbs., I looked like a little kid wearing his dad’s suit for dress-up," Clark said. (Photo/Philip Clark)

As the days passed, the weight began to come off.

For the next two weeks, I was back to the full liquid diet. By the end of my first-month post-op, I was allowed to eat soft puréed food. Let me tell you, chicken mush never tasted so good! By this time, I had lost about 25 pounds, and I was beginning to see and feel the changes.

January brought more good news. I was down about 50 pounds, and my clothes were starting to sag off my body! Even more impressively, I was starting to realize the difference that this weight loss was going to make. I wasn’t winded as easily. I had more energy. During training, I had more to give. I had cinched up my turnout gear as much as I could, but by this point, I looked like a little kid wearing his dad’s suit for dress-up.

As the pounds kept coming off, my mental health began to improve as well. I started to feel better about myself on both the outside and the inside. It was a whole new experience for me, but the best was yet to come.
“Is this how healthy people feel?”

By early summer, I was down almost 100 pounds. It was at this point that two very big events occurred – eye-opening events in my weight-loss journey.

The first was a working fire that just a year ago would have wiped me out and required at least a day of recovery. I found that I was able to make my SCBA breathing air last longer and that I didn’t feel as tired afterward. It was amazing to me that I had more to give when the job was done! Is this how healthy people feel?! Even though I am a paramedic, I had no idea that my extra weight was putting such a strain on my body, and I couldn’t believe that I had waited this long to take on this problem head-on.

The second event was the physical agility test for the career department to which I had applied. In the past, I talked myself out of these kinds of tests by making excuses – all out of fear of failure. I would wait to get the medical release signed until it was too late. I would make sure I was working on the day of the test and that I “wouldn’t be able to get off.” I was trying to protect my pride by making sure that if I didn’t take the test, I wouldn’t fail. On the day of the test, I was more confident and felt better prepared than I had felt about anything in a long time. It was hard, but I passed! Not only that, but I passed with a significant amount of time leftover! After successfully passing the agility test and the interview process, I was hired to be a full-time firefighter.
“You need to make the choice”

This journey has been hard. I still struggle with emotional eating, and I work every day to try to better myself. I find that there are days when I backslide, but it only takes a quick trip down memory lane through my photos to see how far I have come and to remember how much I do not want to go back to where I was.

I would like to encourage everyone reading this to take a moment to perform a self-assessment. Ask yourself the following questions:
“If my loved one – my daughter, my son, my spouse, my parent – was trapped in a fire, would I want ME being the one to have to make that rescue?”
Could you, without a doubt, do the job?
Could you give it your all and still have some left over?

If the answer is no, there is only one person who can fix it. You need to make the choice to make yourself better.

There is a quote from Greek philosopher Heraclitus that says the following: “Out of every one hundred men, ten shouldn’t even be there, eighty are just targets, nine are the real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the one, one is a warrior, and he will bring the others back.”

Are you one of the 10 that shouldn’t be there, the 80 who are just targets, or are you the one? I may not be the one – I don’t think that anyone can label themselves as such – but I am now confident that I am one of the nine real fighters. I will continue to strive every day to be the one, and to never go back to being one of the 90 ever again.

So come with me, and together we can achieve our goals. Believe in yourself. BE THE ONE!

Sunday, November 14, 2021

Wednesday, November 10, 2021

Unvaccinated Texans 40 times more likely to die of covid than those fully vaccinated in 2021

From the Washington Post

Unvaccinated Texans 40 times more likely to die of covid than those fully vaccinated in 2021, study says
Paulina Firozi1:23 p.m. EST

A medic from the Houston fire department prepares to transport a covid-19 patient to a hospital on Aug. 24. (John Moore/Getty Images)

A vast majority of Texans who have died of covid-19 since the beginning of the year were unvaccinated, according to a grim new Texas health department report released Monday.

The report from the Texas Department of State Health Services examined data from Jan. 15 to Oct. 1 and found that unvaccinated people were much more likely to get infected and die of the coronavirus than those who got their shots.

Of the nearly 29,000 covid-linked fatalities in Texas during that period, more than 85 percent were of unvaccinated individuals. Nearly 7 percent of the deaths were among partially vaccinated people, while nearly 8 percent were fully vaccinated.

The figures highlight just how much more at risk the unvaccinated population has been this year: In all age groups, the state’s unvaccinated were 40 times more likely to die than fully vaccinated people. The study also found that the unvaccinated in all age groups were 45 times more likely to have a coronavirus infection than fully vaccinated people. It also looked closely at data from September and underlined the impact of the highly contagious delta variant, which fueled a surge in Texas, as it did in much of the country.

The report from Texas health officials underscores the risk that cases and death counts would spike among the unvaccinated, echoing the alarms that public health officials have been sounding throughout the year. The report, which Texas health officials say is the first statistical assessment of the real-world effect there of vaccination against the coronavirus, also highlights the impact in a state where Republican leaders have sharpened attacks on public health strategies throughout the pandemic. Last month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) banned any entity in the state from mandating vaccines for workers or customers.

“This analysis quantifies what we’ve known for months,” Jennifer A. Shuford, the state’s chief epidemiologist, said in a statement. “The COVID-19 vaccines are doing an excellent job of protecting people from getting sick and from dying from COVID-19. Vaccination remains the best way to keep yourself and the people close to you safe from this deadly disease.”

Shuford’s remarks echo statements from other health leaders, including Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who has described the nation’s ordeal as “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.”

While Texas is still averaging more than 3,200 new daily infections and almost 110 deaths a day, the state, like the nation overall, has seen case and death totals fall, according to data tracked by The Washington Post.

Nearly 54 percent of the state’s population is fully vaccinated, trailing the national vaccination rate of 58.4 percent.

The state data “shows what we already knew — that the unvaccinated are increasing their risk of severe covid disease and death, and we have the data now to prove this,” said Bhavna Lall, a clinical assistant professor at the University of Houston College of Medicine.

She said she’s troubled by leaders questioning public health mitigation measures and vaccination mandates, particularly in a state that’s had more than 70,000 deaths since the pandemic’s start — one of the highest total death counts in the country.

“By debating mitigation measures, we’re not helping in any way,” she said. “We know what works for decreasing the spread of covid. We know that vaccination works, we know masking works.”


Recent findings from the CDC similarly highlighted risks for the unvaccinated. A CDC study published in September found that people who were not fully vaccinated in the spring and summer were more than 10 times more likely to be hospitalized and 11 times more likely to die of covid-19 than people who were fully vaccinated.

Unvaccinated people were 11 times more likely to die of covid-19, CDC report finds

The new report from Texas also breaks out findings from the weeks between Sept. 4 and Oct. 1, which the health department said researchers wanted to analyze to measure the vaccine’s effectiveness as the delta variant surged in the state.

In that time frame, unvaccinated people were 20 times more likely to experience a covid-associated death than fully vaccinated people, and were 13 times more likely to become infected with the virus than the fully vaccinated.

The Texas data strengthens scientists’ assertions “that vaccines work,” said Rama Thyagarajan, an assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin’s Dell Medical School.


She noted that the small percentage of fully vaccinated Texans who died probably were “the oldest and sickest of the group.”

The report said 35 percent of deaths were among people 75 years and older, and 25 percent were among those 65 to 74.

While the vaccination against the coronavirus had a strong protective effect for all people, the report notes, the findings varied by age on the protective impact for covid-related deaths. Unvaccinated people in their 40s were 55 times more likely to die of covid-19 in September than fully vaccinated people of the same age. For people age 75 and older, the unvaccinated were 12 times more likely to die than the vaccinated in that time frame.

The report also highlighted the severity of the impact of the delta variant overall. Regardless of vaccination status, the report says, Texans were four to five times more likely to become infected with the coronavirus or to suffer a covid-linked death in August, when the variant was prevalent in the state, than in April, before its presence was widespread.

Lall said it was “sad to see that during the time when delta was surging, we had so many people … dying because they just didn’t get the vaccine.”

She said the latest report from Texas, which shows the protection offered by vaccination, underlines the need to encourage not only more vaccinations but public health measures that can help stop the virus from surging.

“We need to be aware that other parts of the world are surging — Europe has high covid cases right now — and if we don’t get more people vaccinated in America, we’re still at risk,” she said, adding: “No one wants to go through these surges again and again.”

Saturday, October 23, 2021

As coronavirus cases mount and vaccine mandates spread, holdouts plague police and fire departments

Washington Post
Mark Berman October 2, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. EDT


When the coronavirus vaccines were first rolled out, the national Fraternal Order of Police went to the federal government, pleading for law enforcement officers to have “expedited access” to the shots. Police, the group wrote, needed the vaccines “to keep them, and the public with whom they interact, safe from infection.”

But to the group’s surprise, officers did not rush to get the shot. And months later, with the vaccines widely available across the country, scores remain unvaccinated.

“We worked very hard, along with others, to ensure that police officers had early availability on a premise that they’d all want it,” said James Pasco, FOP executive director.

Nearly a quarter of Americans age 18 and older remain unvaccinated, according to a Washington Post analysis of federal data, frustrating officials and fueling bitter debates. Yet the continued resistance among the first responders included in those tens of millions is particularly troubling and creates a different kind of threat, experts say.

Foxboro Police Officer Brendan Fayles checks in at the Putnam Clubhouse at Gillette Stadium in Foxboro, Mass. to receive his coronavirus vaccination on Jan. 15. (Mark Stockwell/AP)

Due to the nature of their jobs, first responders regularly have close contact with the public, which increases their risk of contracting and spreading the coronavirus among themselves, their families, and the people they are sworn to protect, experts in public health and policing said.

“They’re going to get infected because they have more contact with people than most,” said Vincent Racaniello, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Columbia University. “It doesn’t work any other way.”

Changing recommendations for boosters leads to confusion for the vaccinated and their doctors

The resistance to vaccination is surprising, some said, given how the virus has battered law enforcement’s ranks since the beginning of the pandemic and continued to do so as the delta variant has taken hold.

Covid was the leading cause of line-of-duty deaths last year, killing at least 182 officers, according to the National Law Enforcement Memorial Fund, which tracks such deaths. That’s nearly double the number killed by gun violence and vehicle crashes combined. At least 133 officers have died of covid so far this year, according to the organization.

But despite the toll the pandemic has taken, tensions over vaccinations have only increased as unions and individual officers and firefighters have railed against mandates, filing lawsuits and threatening to quit if the shots are required.

Pfizer, partnering with BioNTech, and Moderna has created effective coronavirus vaccines that scientists hope will lead to medical breakthroughs using mRNA. (Joshua Carroll, Brian Monroe/The Washington Post)

When Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) announced that all city employees would have to be vaccinated by Oct. 15, the head of the city’s largest police union compared it to the Holocaust.

“We’re in America, G------n it. We don’t want to be forced to do anything. Period,” FOP President John Catanzara told the Chicago Sun-Times. “This ain’t Nazi f---ing Germany, [where they say], ‘Step into the f---ing showers. The pills won’t hurt you.’” he said.

Catanzara later posted a video apologizing for the comments, which were condemned by the mayor and Jewish leaders.

The Los Angeles County Health Department identified hundreds of coronavirus outbreaks at police and fire agencies across the county, according to records obtained by the Los Angeles Times. The outbreaks accounted for more than 2,500 cases — more than half of which were in the Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Fire Department, the paper reported. The fire department said recently that more than half its sworn members have been fully vaccinated, while police chief Michel Moore reported this week that more than 60 percent of his agency’s 12,000 employees — sworn officers and civilians — are fully vaccinated.

Yet employees of both departments have been fierce critics of vaccine requirements and have filed lawsuits in response to a mandate that all municipal employees be vaccinated by Oct. 5, unless they have a medical or religious exemption. Thousands of police employees have indicated they will seek such exemptions.

While there has been much national debate over vaccine mandates in the workplace, experts say first responders are a special case because of the unique position they hold in American life.

Officers wield significant authority, and many of the public’s interactions with police are initiated by officers or by 911 calls summoning them, with people having no choice about whether to engage.

“Somebody gets stopped at a traffic light for a traffic violation, the window goes down, the officer leans toward the person … if they go to a house where there’s been a complaint, they go into the house,” said Jack Greene, professor emeritus of criminology and criminal justice at Northeastern University. “They’re always going into public spaces.”

When police knock on someone’s door, “more often than not, people accede to that request,” said Greene, who has consulted for police departments. “And if they don’t, the door might get broken down. It really boggles the imagination” that any first responder could respond to a call and potentially expose someone else to the virus, he said.

“At the risk of sounding a little bit snide, maybe we should take protect and serve off the sides of patrol cars and put down show up and infect,” he said.

They’re called mild cases. But people with breakthrough covid can still feel pretty sick.

Experts were split about the reasons behind so many officers remaining resistant to vaccination. Some point to the same misinformation and fear impacting the decisions of other Americans.

“Police officers are no different than other people in their community,” said Pasco, with the FOP. He said his initial surprise that police did not flock to the vaccines in larger numbers faded as he saw how fractured the general public was on the topic.

“I’m better informed today as to the depths of divisions on this issue than I was when vaccines first became available,” Pasco said. “The country has not embraced vaccines to the degree that most people anticipated.”

West Virginia was an early leader in covid-19 vaccinations, but health officials say they have hit a wall of vaccine resistance and misinformation. (Jorge Ribas/The Washington Post)

In a recent policy statement, Pasco’s group reiterated its support for vaccinations and said “whether or not to accept the vaccine is a personal decision” up to individual members.

Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, who frequently speaks to police chiefs, said it appeared to be “predominantly younger officers who do not want to get vaccinated.”

Wexler called the trend “puzzling,” saying he couldn’t explain it.

Charleston police Lt. Robert Gamard reported that some of his department’s officers have said they were still “meaning to do it,” while others remain adamantly opposed. There is no vaccine mandate, he said, but the department has been pushing information to its officers and is exploring making vaccinations available during roll call.

“We’re going to keep trying,” said Gamard, who oversees training for the force.

David J. Thomas, a professor at Florida Gulf Coast University and a retired police officer, described policing as “very conservative in nature.” He noted that in the past, officers have resisted other measures meant to protect them, such as body armor, and are hesitant to adapt to changes.

Officers have the “belief that it’s just not going to happen to them,” he said. Thomas said one police chief told him, “We’ve done everything we can to get them vaccinated, and they won’t listen.”

Thomas said he also believed some officers are vaccinated but not admitting it, comparing it to the work he does with law enforcement on mental health issues. Some officers are hesitant to admit they need help, fearful of seeming weak, and admitting they are vaccinated might be similar, he said.

But as the delta variant-fueled virus surge continues to sweep the country, the prospect of significant numbers of first responders falling ill raises other issues.

“I’m going to use a term the Pentagon would use: It’s a matter of force readiness,” said Sandra C. Quinn, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Public Health. “Will they have a healthy workforce that’s vital for protecting public safety and well-being?”

A vaccine mandate fractures a state fair, leaving children as ‘pawns’

Miami police chief Art Acevedo said he found officers’ resistance to vaccination “very surprising” and “disappointing.”

Acevedo has been an outspoken advocate for vaccinations, and when he signaled support for a mandate last month, local and national police groups lashed out. Pasco called it “management by tantrum,” while the local police union’s president in a letter called the chief’s comments “flat out demoralizing.”

After the pushback, Acevedo, who was chief in Houston before becoming the Miami department’s leader in April, was undeterred, saying unions arguing against mandates were practicing “labor leadership by hypocrisy” after demanding more protective equipment for officers early in the pandemic.

“We need to do everything we can to keep each other alive,” Acevedo said in an interview. “And the one thing when it comes to covid that we know, that the data shows, that’ll help you stay alive … is being vaccinated.”

However, Charlotte-Mecklenburg police chief Johnny Jennings said while he believes in vaccination, he does not support a mandate. Jennings said he preferred to “continue to educate and get cooperation from people to go and voluntarily get vaccinated.”

He noted that the pandemic has “been devastating” for police.

“We don't have the luxury of putting … Plexiglass between us and the people we come in contact with,” Jennings said. He said police “have to be responsible to protect ourselves.”

Yolian Y. Ortiz, a spokeswoman for the FOP lodge representing officers in Charlotte, similarly backed vaccinations while pushing against any requirement.

“We are asking everybody to get vaccinated,” she said. “But we believe it’s a personal choice and should not be mandated.”

Officers, she said, are going through the same thought process as others who have not gotten the shots.

“You want your employees to be able to exercise that personal choice, like religion or your freedom of speech. You don’t want that to be infringed upon,” Ortiz said.

Some departments have been able to obtain high compliance without mandates. Ian Adams, a former police officer in Utah who is a doctoral candidate at the University of Utah, studied police vaccination rates in Salt Lake City and found that most of the department’s officers were vaccinated in a matter of days. Adams said the department’s leadership helped fuel the outcome. (A spokesman for the department said the police chief was not available for an interview.)

“My question for people talking about mandates, is there an alternative to consider? It requires a lot of leadership and hard work and transparency, but none of that’s impossible,” said Adams, who also is also executive director of the Utah State Fraternal Order of Police. “And I think that’s what this case demonstrated.”

Exactly how many officers nationwide are vaccinated is unknown. There are more than 15,000 local police departments in the United States, each with its own policies, and no government agency tracking the information.

The Washington Post requested vaccination rates and policies from dozens of police, fire and city officials. Several said they did not keep track of vaccination rates or had incomplete statistics, while some departments reported numbers suggesting thousands of their employees remained unvaccinated.

Police officials in Atlanta, Austin, Dallas and San Antonio — cities that are home to some of the country’s largest departments — said they have not kept records of vaccinations among their forces, nor were mandates in place. In Chicago, home to the country’s second-largest local police force, officials have not kept track of how many officers are vaccinated although a mandate for city employees goes into effect later this month.

Four patients, two dialysis machines: Rationing medical care becomes a reality in hospitals overwhelmed with covid patients

Of the major departments that are keeping track, Las Vegas officials said more than half of that city’s force is fully vaccinated. The department also said that vaccinations are required for newly-hired police employees.

There is no mandate for New York City police, the country’s largest local department, which said about 62 percent of its workforce — which includes 36,000 officers as well as 19,000 civilian personnel — had gotten vaccinated as of Sept. 23. By comparison, 74 percent of adults in New York are fully vaccinated, according to city data.

Data reported by fire departments also varied. In Austin, vaccinations are not mandated, but fire officials said that 4 in 5 personnel were vaccinated. Both New York and Los Angeles departments reported that more than half of employees are vaccinated.

In Denver, a vaccine mandate covering government workers — including police, fire and sheriff’s department employees — went into effect at the end of September, and those who refuse risk losing their jobs.

Even without mandates, experts said, first responders have an obligation to get vaccinated to protect the public.

They are in “very public-facing positions, and they really have a responsibility to keep the public safe,” said Racaniello, the Columbia professor.

Friday, October 15, 2021

COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates—A Wider Freedom

Lawrence O. Gostin, JD
Author Affiliations Article Information
JAMA Health Forum. 2021;2(10):e213852. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3852
COVID-19 Resource Center

President Biden has required COVID-19 vaccinations across much of the US workforce, reaching nearly 100 million workers. Opponents call it unconstitutional, a violation of personal freedom, and even “un-American.” The truth is that vaccine mandates are lawful and deeply entrenched in US history and values. They constitute a “wider freedom” so that everyone in society can feel safer where they work, learn, worship, and live.

Vaccine Mandates Integral to US Culture and Tradition

Vaccine mandates are very much part of US culture and tradition dating back to the colonial era, even before Edward Jenner’s 1796 discovery of cowpox vaccinia. George Washington required smallpox inoculations for the Continental Army in 1777, writing that “we should have more to dread from [smallpox], than from the sword of the enemy.” He condemned a Virginia law restricting inoculations, saying he would rather move for a law to compel inoculation of all children “under severe penalties.” Massachusetts enacted the first law mandating immunization in 1809, and by the time the US Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality in Jacobson v Massachusetts (1905), municipal and state smallpox vaccination mandates were prevalent across the US.

States began requiring childhood vaccinations as a condition of school entry by the mid-19th century and by 1963, 20 states had school vaccine mandates. Although the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a recommended schedule for child and adolescent immunization, it does not set vaccination requirements for schools. The CDC points out that each state makes its own decisions about which vaccines are required for school attendance in that state. All school immunization laws grant medical exemptions, 44 states grant religious exemptions, and 15 states allow philosophical exemptions. Although vaccines are not routinely required for adults in most settings, they are often mandated for military service members, new immigrants seeking permanent US residence, college and university students, and health care workers. Previous epidemics like the 2018-2019 measles outbreak in New York City were quashed by emergency vaccine mandates for adults in affected zones. Even before President Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate announcement, several cities and states, businesses, and institutions of higher education had issued their own COVID-19 vaccine mandates.1

COVID-19 vaccine mandates, therefore, should not be viewed as an aberration but as the continuation of a long tradition in the US to prevent or mitigate infectious disease outbreaks and epidemics. The CDC recognizes vaccinations as among the top public health achievements of the 20th century.

Vaccine Mandates Lawful

Cities and states have broad “police powers” to require vaccinations, upheld twice by the US Supreme Court in 1905 and 1922. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is fully licensed for individuals aged 16 years or older and has received Emergency Use Authorization for children aged 12 to 15 years. (It is likely that vaccines will soon be authorized for children aged ≥5 years.) The police powers of cities and states enable them to require eligible individuals to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 for school attendance, as the Los Angeles Unified School District recently did covering more than 600 000 students. New York City’s “Key to NYC” program requires proof of COVID-19 vaccination for indoor activities such as dining, fitness, and entertainment. The courts have upheld Jacobson v Massachusetts for more than a century, affording municipalities and states wide discretion in exercising public health powers, including mandatory vaccinations.2

Unlike cities and states, the federal government does not have broad public health powers. The president has only limited public health powers and could not, for example, issue a nationwide vaccine mandate. President Biden’s 3 vaccine requirements, however, have strong legal support. First, President Biden ordered all federal workers and contractors to be vaccinated. There is no option to be tested for COVID-19 instead of being vaccinated. As head of the federal workforce, Biden has the power to set evidence-based safety standards, including mandating masks and vaccines. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Justice both advised that governments and businesses can require COVID-19 vaccines as a condition of employment, so long as they provide religious and medical exemptions. Courts also have upheld COVID-19 vaccine mandates for employees as well as college students.

Second, President Biden ordered all health care facilities to require COVID-19 vaccinations as a condition of receiving certain Medicaid or Medicare funding. The Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government can set reasonable conditions for the receipt of federal funds. In South Dakota v Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld a law requiring states to adopt a minimum drinking age of 21 years as a condition of receiving certain federal highway funds. So-called conditional spending must be reasonable. For example, the Supreme Court struck down a requirement in the Affordable Care Act for states to expand Medicaid as a condition of receiving all Medicaid funding, ruling that the amount of funding at stake made the contingency unduly coercive.

President Biden’s third, and most controversial, vaccine mandate requires businesses with 100 or more employees to either mandate COVID-19 vaccinations or institute weekly testing and other risk mitigation measures. Opponents have called it an “overreach” and unconstitutional, but President Biden is acting at the height of his presidential powers. He is not making a unilateral executive decision but is rather acting through specific congressional authorization. In 1970, Congress enacted the Occupational Safety and Health Act precisely because of a weak patchwork of state worker safety regulations. It empowered the Department of Labor to set uniform national workplace safety standards, including emergency temporary standards in response to workplace hazards. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 can be just as hazardous as workplace injury risks. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has already set emergency temporary standards for COVID-19 exposures in health care settings. Previously, OSHA set bloodborne pathogen standards that included hepatitis B vaccinations. OSHA is currently devising emergency temporary standards for COVID-19 vaccination or weekly testing, which is expected to be issued soon.


Two Freedoms

Freedom holds deep ethical and legal value in the US. There are at least 2 types of freedom—freedom from personal restraint and a wider freedom to engage in daily life without significant risk of exposure to safety hazards. Vaccine mandates are justified under both notions of freedom. Certainly, competent adults have the right to bodily integrity and to make their own health care decisions. Yet, the right of informed consent has clear limits. No one has the right to expose others to a potentially serious infectious disease. Even though breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after vaccination do occur, vaccinated individuals pose transmission risks for much shorter periods compared with unvaccinated individuals. Thus, a fully vaccinated workforce, especially if layered with other risk mitigation measures such as wearing a mask and improved ventilation, creates a far safer environment for everyone.

In his annual address to Congress in 1941, Franklin D. Roosevelt identified “Four Freedoms”—for speech and worship, as well as freedom from want and from fear. By freedom from fear, he meant that the public has the right to engage in daily social and economic life without fear of avoidable harms. It is unknown how much COVID-19 vaccination coverage is needed to contain SARS-CoV-2, but it probably requires rates exceeding 80% of the population. It is important to remember that everyone in society is interconnected. Our individual choice to not get vaccinated poses avoidable risks to the people we interact with and those with whom they interact. The higher the vaccination coverage, the safer we all are.

Highly vaccinated populations create a wider freedom to return more safely to the ordinary activities people value—such as going to work, school, cafés or restaurants, the theater, or sporting events, as well as traveling. COVID-19 vaccines are a remarkable scientific tool that enables society to live in greater freedom and with less fear. Using every tool—including mandates—to achieve high vaccination coverage enhances freedom.
Back to top
Article Information

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Gostin LO. JAMA Health Forum.

Corresponding Author: Lawrence O. Gostin, JD, Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001 (gostin@georgetown.edu).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
References
1.
Gostin LO, Shaw J, Salmon DA. Mandatory SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in K-12 schools, colleges/universities, and businesses.  JAMA. 2021;326(1):25-26. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.9342
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Gostin LO. Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years: police power and civil liberties in tension.  Am J Public Health. 2005;95(4):576-581. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.055152PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref

Wednesday, October 13, 2021

The Right Answer and the Effective Answer

The comment below was written by an orthopedic surgeon in response to this article

October 8, 2021

Steven Zeitzew, M.D. | West Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center
There is a large difference between being correct and being effective. As an orthopaedic surgeon I learned long ago that telling patients what to do is less effective than informing them effectively about the consequences of the choices before them, and gently guiding them so they can make the correct choice willingly. Sometimes mandates are effective and necessary, such as vaccines for schoolchildren or for healthcare workers in at least some circumstances. What we are learning is that telling people we are forcing them to do the right thing is sometimes not an effective technique for getting them to actually do the right thing. Sometimes telling a "biker dude" that he cannot put weight on his leg after fracture surgery won't work, because he won't do something just because he is instructed to, and is in fact more likely to do the opposite. That same patient is smart enough to make a good decision if he is informed of the poor prognosis associated with excessive premature weight-bearing before fracture healing. That is human nature. We don't like being told what to do. We do like making well-informed decisions on our own. Even a well-intended mandate based on the best evidence will sometimes be a less effective technique for getting people to make the right choice.

It might be more effective to provide reliable information and allow patients to decide about vaccination on their own in many circumstances, even though some will make the poor choice of declining vaccination, in spite of the overwhelming and persuasive evidence supporting COVID vaccination. Liberty and freedom are important to human beings, and threatening to take it away will have consequences. We will find we cannot force all people to do the right thing. We will also find that most people will make the choice to do the right thing when they are allowed to give informed consent, the same standard we use for other medical interventions, even when they face a life and death choice that affects them and those around them. Yes, sometimes we must impose a choice in order to protect others. Forcing our choice may not be the most effective technique in this instance.

Thursday, October 7, 2021

In case you're in Irving and or headed here....

Captain Jeff Wright secured the funding and filed the mandatory Certificate of Insurance (COI), the course for event number 518 was set up and ready to go. 

Then the DFW fire marshals descended with the grim news. The event cannot be held on an empty parking lot that can accommodate a 747. They delivered the news after the close of business sending us into General Quarters status with an after-hours search for Plan B.

As we packed up under the dark sky, we secured an alternative location: The Irving Mall. 

So, we'll take the tower down first thing tomorrow and the show will go on at 4p CDT. 6.7 miles away

See you there: 






Saturday, October 2, 2021

Opinion: Covid-19 is sticking around. Time to stop pretending it’s not your problem.

Eugene Robinson

Washington Post, Oct 1, 2021

It is mystifying to me, and to many others, that such a divide could possibly exist. Yet an estimated 70 million Americans who are eligible to protect themselves against being hospitalized or dying from covid-19 have not done so. To be as generous as possible, some of those people may still worry about losing days off work to side effects or fear that getting a shot could reveal their undocumented status. But the selfishness and foolishness of people who don’t face those obstacles endanger not only their own health but everyone else’s as well.

Not getting vaccinated is indeed a decision, at this point, given the practically universal access to safe and effective vaccines that the entire nation enjoys. Guaranteeing protection from this highly infectious and deadly disease is no more difficult or complicated than dropping by your neighborhood pharmacy once or twice and rolling up your sleeve. Serious side effects are astonishingly rare, and more routine ones are manageable and often, as was true for me, nonexistent. And the benefits are massive, both for individuals and society.

Are you a lover of freedom? Do you hate all those covid-19 restrictions? Have you been impatient for life to get back to the old normal? Then get yourself vaccinated immediately and do everything you can to make sure your family and friends do the same. Aim your torch-and-pitchfork anger at the covid-19 virus — not at the experts and officials who are trying to save your life even as circumstances and available evidence shift around them.

The willfully unvaccinated are covid-19’s enablers. They are giving the virus an enormous supply of potential hosts, allowing it to thrive and evolve — perhaps someday in a way that evades the vaccines. They are filling intensive-care hospital beds and keeping beleaguered doctors and nurses under constant, and unnecessary, siege. They are prolonging a crisis that we have the resources to get under control.

Incredibly, cynical politicians are actively boosting the death toll. Florida, where Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) has sought to further his presidential hopes by pandering to the anti-vaccination crowd, suffered 14,334 covid-19 deaths this summer, according to figures compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) earned membership in the Pandemic Hall of Shame on Wednesday by tweeting that “I stand with” the handful of National Basketball Association players who have publicly refused to be vaccinated. Similarly enshrined are Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, and a host of other ambitious Republicans who seek to curry favor with the party’s populist base by painting vaccination as a question of free choice rather than an imperative of public health.

Ultimately, however, there comes a point where this crisis is not about unscrupulous presidential wannabes. Yes, they may be persuading some of the tens of millions of holdouts, but they’re also doing it to win the approval of those who have decided not to protect themselves and others. Given the negative impact these free-riders are having on the rest of us, we have every right to be ticked off.

Fortunately, there is an intervention that works to eliminate vaccine hesitancy: employer mandates. If workers are told they must be vaccinated as a condition of keeping their jobs, it turns out that the vast majority comply.

In early August, United Airlines announced that all of its roughly 67,000 U.S. employees would be required to show proof of vaccination or be fired. On Thursday, the airline announced that 99 percent of its workers had complied — and that 320 workers who had neither gotten their shots nor filed for exemptions would be terminated, and are perfectly free to work somewhere else.

It’s clear now that we will be living with covid-19 for some time, though hopefully as an endemic disease like the flu rather than in a state of pandemic urgency. The keyword there is “living” — the vaccines give this country the chance to reduce covid-19 to more of a nuisance than a plague.

Millions of Americans who received the Pfizer vaccine at least six months ago are now eligible to get a booster shot, which experts hope will offer additional protection against covid-19. Boosters for those who got the Moderna or Johnson & Johnson shots will likely soon be offered as well. Those additional shots will make us safer — but if the unvaccinated did their duty, we would all be safer still.

And yes, it is a duty. If you refuse to get vaccinated — without a medical reason — you are failing your family, your community, and your nation. Just get the shot. Today.

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Evidence shows that, yes, masks prevent COVID-19 – and surgical masks are the way to go

Laura (Layla) H. Kwong September 22, 2021 8.55am EDT

Do masks work? And if so, should you reach for an N95, a surgical mask, a cloth mask or a gaiter?

Over the past year and a half, researchers have produced a lot of laboratory, model-based and observational evidence on the effectiveness of masks. For many people it has understandably been hard to keep track of what works and what doesn’t.

I’m an assistant professor of environmental health sciences. I, too, have wondered about the answers to these questions, and earlier this year I led a study that examined the research about which materials are best.

Recently, I was part of the largest randomized controlled trial to date testing the effectiveness of mask-wearing. The study has yet to be peer-reviewed but has been well received by the medical community. What we found provides gold-standard evidence that confirms previous research: Wearing masks, particularly surgical masks, prevents COVID-19. Laboratory studies help scientists understand the physics of masks and spread.
Lab and observational studies

People have been using masks to protect themselves from contracting diseases since the Manchurian outbreak of plague in 1910.

During the coronavirus pandemic, the focus has been on masks as a way of preventing infected persons from contaminating the air around them – called source control. Recent laboratory evidence supports this idea. In April 2020, researchers showed that people infected with a coronavirus – but not SARS-CoV-2 – exhaled less coronavirus RNA into the air around them if they wore a mask. A number of additional laboratory studies have also supported the efficacy of masks.

Out in the real world, many epidemiologists have examined the impact of masking and mask policies to see if masks help slow the spread of COVID-19. One observational study – meaning it was not a controlled study with people wearing or not wearing masks – published in late 2020 looked at demographics, testing, lockdowns and mask-wearing in 196 countries. The researchers found that after controlling for other factors, countries with cultural norms or policies that supported mask-wearing saw weekly per capita coronavirus mortality increase 16% during outbreaks, compared with a 62% weekly increase in countries without mask-wearing norms

Researchers gave surgical masks to adults in 200 villages in Bangladesh to test whether they reduce COVID-19. Innovations for Poverty Action, CC BY-ND
Large-scale randomized mask-wearing

Laboratory, observational and modeling studies, have consistently supported the value of many types of masks. But these approaches are not as strong as large-scale randomized controlled trials among the general public, which compare groups after the intervention has been implemented in some randomly selected groups and not implemented in comparison groups. One such study done in Denmark in early 2020 was inconclusive, but it was relatively small and relied on participants to self-report mask-wearing.

Watch this Youtube Comparision with four different scenarios; 
Four scenarios

From November 2020 to April 2021, my colleagues Jason Abaluck, Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak, Stephen P. Luby, Ashley Styczynski and I – in close collaboration with partners in the Bangladeshi government and the research nonprofit Innovations for Poverty Action – conducted a large-scale randomized controlled trial on masking in Bangladesh. Our goals were to learn the best ways to increase mask-wearing without a mandate, understand the effect of mask-wearing on COVID-19, and compare cloth masks and surgical masks.

The study involved 341,126 adults in 600 villages in rural Bangladesh. In 300 villages we did not promote masks, and people continued wearing masks, or not, as they had before. In 200 villages we promoted the use of surgical masks, and in 100 villages we promoted cloth masks, testing a number of different outreach strategies in each group.

Over the course of eight weeks, our team distributed free masks to each adult in the mask groups at their homes, provided information about the risks of COVID-19 and the value of mask-wearing. We also worked with community and religious leaders to model and promote mask-wearing and hired staff to walk around the village and politely ask people who were not wearing a mask to put one on. Plainclothes staff recorded whether people wore masks properly over their mouth and nose, improperly or not at all.

Both five weeks and nine weeks after starting the study, we collected data from all adults on symptoms of COVID-19 during the study period. If a person reported any symptoms of COVID-19, we took and tested a blood sample for evidence of infection.
Based on current evidence, many places across the U.S. have some form of mask requirements. AP Photo/LM Otero
Mask-wearing reduced COVID-19

The first question my colleagues and I needed to answer was whether our efforts led to increased mask-wearing. Mask usage more than tripled, from 13% in the group that wasn’t given masks to 42% in the group that was. Interestingly, physical distancing also increased by 5% in the villages where we promoted masks.

In the 300 villages where we distributed any type of mask, we saw a 9% reduction in COVID-19 compared with villages where we did not promote masks. Because of the small number of villages where we promoted cloth masks, we were not able to tell whether cloth or surgical masks were better at reducing COVID-19.

We did have a large enough sample size to determine that in villages where we distributed surgical masks, COVID-19 fell by 12%. In those villages COVID-19 fell by 35% for people 60 years and older and 23% for people 50-60 years old. When looking at COVID-19-like symptoms we found that both surgical and cloth masks resulted in a 12% reduction.
The body of evidence supports masks

Before this study there was a lack of gold-standard evidence on the effectiveness of masks to reduce COVID-19 in daily life. Our study provides strong real-world evidence that surgical masks reduce COVID-19, particularly for older adults who face higher rates of death and disability if they get infected.

Policymakers and public health officials now have evidence from laboratories, models, observations and real-world trials that support mask-wearing to reduce respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. Given that COVID-19 can so easily spread from person to person, if more people wear masks the benefits increase.

So next time you are wondering if you should wear a mask, the answer is yes. Cloth masks are likely better than nothing, but high-quality surgical masks or masks with even higher filtration efficiency and better fit – such as KF94s, KN95s and N95s – are the most effective at preventing COVID-19.